Posted April 7, 2003
We All Depend Upon Each Other
by
Anthony de Mello, SJ
But it's what all the mystics in the past have been telling us. I'm not
saying that "me," the conditioned-self, will not sometimes fall into its
usual patterns. That's the way we've been conditioned. But it raises the
question whether it is conceivable to live a life in which you would be so
totally alone that you would depend on no one.
We all depend on one another for all kinds of things, don't we? We depend
on the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker. Interdependence. That's
fine! We set up society this way and we allot different functions to
different people for the welfare of everyone, so that we will function
better and live more effectively -- at least we hope so. But to depend on
another psychologically -- to depend on another emotionally -- what does
that imply? It means to depend on another human being for my happiness.
Think about that. Because if you do, the next thing you will be doing,
whether you're aware of it or not, is DEMANDING that other people
contribute to your happiness. Then there will be a next step -- fear, fear
of loss, fear of alienation, fear of rejection, mutual control. Perfect
love casts out fear. Where there is love there are no demands, no
expectations, no dependency. I do not demand that you make me happy; my
happiness does not lie in you. If you were to leave me, I will not feel
sorry for myself; I enjoy your company immensely, but I do not cling.
I enjoy it on a non-clinging basis. What I really enjoy is not you; it's
something that's greater than both you and me. It is something that I
discovered, a kind of symphony, a kind of orchestra that plays one melody
in your presence, but when you depart, the orchestra doesn't stop. When I
meet someone else, it plays another melody, which is also very
delightful. And when I'm alone, it continues to play. There's a great
repertoire and it never ceases to play.
That's what awakening is all about. That's also why we're hypnotized,
brainwashed, asleep It seems terrifying to ask, but can you be said to love
me if you cling to me and will not let me go? If you will not let me
be? Can you be said to love me if you need me psychologically or
emotionally for your happiness? This flies in the face of the universal
teaching of all the scriptures, of all religions, of all the mystics. "How
is it that we missed it for so many years?" I say to myself repeatedly
"How come I didn't see it?" When you read those radical things in the
scriptures, you begin to wonder: Is this man crazy? But after a while you
begin to think everybody else is crazy. "Unless you hate your father and
mother, brothers and sisters, unless you renounce and give up everything
you possess, you cannot be my disciple." You must drop it all. Not
physical renunciation, you understand; that's easy. When your illusions
drop, you're in touch with reality at last, and believe me, you will never
again be lonely, never again. Loneliness is not cured by human
company. Loneliness is cured by contact with reality. Oh, I have so much
to say about that. Contact with reality, dropping one's illusions, making
contact with the real. Whatever it is, it has no name. We can only know
it by dropping what is unreal. You can only know what aloneness is when
you drop your clinging, when you drop your dependency. But the first step
toward that is that you see it as desirable. If you don't see it as
desirable, how will you get anywhere near it?
Think of the loneliness that is yours. Would human company ever take it
away? It will only serve as a distraction. There's an emptiness inside,
isn't there? And when the emptiness surfaces, what do you do? You run
away, turn on the television, turn on the radio, read a book, search for
human company, seek entertainment, seek distraction. Everybody does
that. It's big business nowadays, an organized industry to distract us and
entertain us.
|
|