Posted April 15, 2003
The Undiscovered Self
by Anthony de Mello, SJ
Somebody came up to me once during a conference and asked, "What about 'Our
Lady of Fatima'?" What do you think of her? When I am asked questions
like that, I am reminded of the story of the time they were taking the
statue of Our Lady of Fatima on an airplane to a pilgrimage for worship,
and as they were flying over the South of France the plane began to wobble
and to shake and it looked like it was going to come apart. And the
miraculous statue cried out, "Our Lady of Lourdes, pray for us!" And all
was well. Wasn't it wonderful, one "Our Lady" helping another "Our Lady"?
There was also a group of a thousand people who went on a pilgrimage to
Mexico City to venerate the shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe and sat down
before the statue in protest because the Bishop of the Diocese had declared
"Our Lady of Lourdes" patroness of the diocese! They were sure that Our
Lady of Guadalupe felt this very much, so they were doing the protest in
REPARATION for the offense. That's the trouble with religion, if you don't
watch out.
When I speak to Hindus, I tell them, "Your priests are not going to be
happy to hear this" (notice how prudent I am this morning), "but God would
be much happier, according to Jesus Christ, if you were transformed than if
you worshipped. He would be much more pleased by your loving than by your
adoration." And when I talk to Moslems, I say, "Your Ayatollah and your
mullahs are not going to be happy to hear this, but God is going to be much
more pleased by your being transformed into a loving person than by saying,
"Lord, Lord." It's infinitely more important that you be waking
up. That's spirituality, that's everything. If you have that, you have
God. Then you worship "in spirit and in truth." When you become love,
when you are transformed into love. The danger of what religion can do is
very nicely brought out in a story told by Cardinal Martini, the Archbishop
of Milan. The story has to do with an Italian couple that's getting
married. They have an arrangement with the parish priest to have a little
reception in the parish courtyard outside the church. But it rained, and
they couldn't have the reception, so they said to the priest, "Would it be
all right if we had the celebration in the church?"
Now Father wasn't one bit happy about having a reception in the church, but
they said, "We will eat a little cake, sing a little song, drink a little
wine, and then go home." So Father was persuaded. But being good
life-loving Italians they drank a little wine, sang a little song, then
drank a little more wine, and sang some more songs, and within a half hour
there was a great celebration going on in the church. And everybody was
having a great time, lots of fun and frolic. But Father was all tense,
pacing up and down in the sacristy, all upset about the noise they were
making. The assistant pastor comes in and says, "I see you are quite tense."
"Of course, I'm tense. Listen to all the noise they are making, and in the
House of God!, for heaven's sake!"
"Well, Father, they really had no place to go."
"I know that! But do they have to make all that racket?"
"Well, we mustn't forget, must we, Father, that Jesus himself was once
present at a wedding!"
Father says, "I know Jesus Christ was present at a wedding banquet, YOU
don't have to tell me Jesus Christ was present at a wedding banquet! But
they didn't have the Blessed Sacrament there!!!"
You know there are times like that when the Blessed Sacrament becomes more
important than Jesus Christ. When worship becomes more important than
love, when the Church becomes more important than life. When God becomes
more important than the neighbor. And so it goes on. That's the
danger. To my mind this is what Jesus was evidently calling us to -- first
things first! The human being is much more important than the
Sabbath.. Doing what I tell you, namely, becoming what I am indicating to
you, is much more important than Lord, Lord. But your mullah is not going
to be happy to hear that, I assure you. Your priests are not going to be
happy to hear that. Not generally. So that's what we have been talking
about. Spirituality. Waking up. And as I told you, it is extremely
important if you want to wake up to go in for what I call "self
observation." Be aware of what you're saying, be aware of what you're
doing, be aware of what you're thinking, be aware of how you're acting. Be
aware of where you're coming from, what your motives are. The unaware life
is not worth living.
The unaware life is a mechanical life. It's not human, it's programmed,
conditioned. We might as well be a stone, a block of wood. In the country
where I come from, you have hundreds of thousands of people living in
little hovels, in extreme poverty, who just manage to survive, working all
day long, hard manual work, sleep and then wake up in the morning, eat
something, and start all over again. And you sit back and think, "What a
life." "Is that all that life holds in store for them?" And then you're
suddenly jolted into the realization that 99.999% of people here are not
much better. You can go to the movies, drive around in a car, you can go
for a cruise. Do you think you are much better off than they are? You are
just as dead as they are. Just as much a machine as they are -- a slightly
bigger one, but a machine nevertheless. That's sad. It's sad to think
that people go through life like this.
People go through life with fixed ideas; they never change. They're just
not aware of what's going on. They might as well be a block of wood, or a
rock, a talking, walking, thinking machine. That's not human. They are
puppets, jerked around by all kinds of things. Press a button and you get
a reaction. You can almost predict how this person is going to react. If
I study a person, I can tell you just how he or she is going to
react. With my therapy group, sometimes I write on a piece of paper that
so-and-so is going to start the session and so-and-so will reply. Do you
think that's bad? Well, don't listen to people who say to you, "Forget
yourself! Go out in love to others." Don't listen to them! They're all
wrong. The worst thing you can do is forget yourself when you go out to
others in the so called helping attitude.
This was brought home to me very forcibly many years ago when I did my
studies in psychology in Chicago. We had a course in counseling for
priests. It was open only to priests who were actually engaged in
counseling and who agreed to bring a taped session to class. There must
have been about twenty of us. When it was my turn, I brought a cassette
with an interview I had had with a young woman. The instructor put it in a
recorder and we all began to listen to it. After five minutes, as was his
custom, the instructor stopped the tape and asked, "Any comments?" Someone
said to me, "Why did you ask her that question?" I said, "I'm not aware
that I asked her a question. As a matter of fact, I'm quite sure I did not
ask any questions." He said, "You did." I was quite sure because at that
time I was consciously following the method of Carl Rogers, which is
person-oriented and non directive. You don't ask questions and you don't
interrupt or give advice. So I was very aware that I mustn't ask
questions. Anyway, there was a dispute between us, so the instructor said,
"Why don't we play the tape again?" So we played it again and there, to my
horror, was a whopping big question, as tall as the Empire State Building,
a huge question. The interesting thing to me was that I had heard that
question three times, the first time, presumably, when I asked it, the
second time when I listened to the tape in my room (because I wanted to
take a good tape to class), and the third time when I heard it in the
classroom. But it hadn't registered! I wasn't aware.
That happens frequently in my therapy sessions or in my spiritual
direction. We tape-record the interview, and when the client listens to
it, he or she says, "You know, I didn't really hear what you said during
the interview. I only heard what you said when I listened to the
tape." More interestingly, I didn't hear what I said during the
interview. It's shocking to discover that I'm saying things in a therapy
session that I'm not aware of. The full import of them only dawns on me
later. Do you call that human? "Forget yourself and go out to others,"
you say! Anyhow, after we listened to the whole tape there in Chicago, the
instructor said, "Are there any comments?" One of the priests, a fifty
year old man to whom I had taken a liking, said to me, "Tony, I'd like to
ask you a personal question. Would that be all right?" I said, "Yes, go
ahead. If I don't want to answer it, I won't." He said, "Is this woman in
the interview pretty?"
You know, honest to goodness, I was at a stage of my development (or
undevelopment) where I didn't notice if someone was good-looking or
not. It didn't matter to me. She was a sheep of Christ's flock; I was a
pastor. I dispensed help. Isn't that great! It was the way we were
trained. So I said to him, "What's that got to do with it?" He said,
"Because you don't like her, do you?" I said, "What?!"
It hadn't ever struck me that I liked or disliked individuals. Like most
people, I had an occasional dislike that would register in consciousness,
but my attitude was mostly neutral. I asked, "What makes you say
that?" He said, "The tape." We went through the tape again, and he said,
"Listen to your voice. Notice how sweet it has become. You're irritated,
aren't you?" I was, and I was only becoming aware of it right there. And
what was I saying to her non-directively? I was saying, "Don't come
back." But I wasn't aware of that. My priest friend said, "She's a
woman. She will have picked this up. When are you supposed to meet her
next?" I said, "Next Wednesday." He said, "My guess is she won't come
back." She didn't. I waited one week but she didn't come. I waited
another week and she didn't come. Then I called her. I broke one of my
rules: Don't be the rescuer.
I called her and said to her, "Remember that tape you allowed me to make
for the class? It was a great help because the class pointed out all kinds
of things to me" (I didn't tell her what!) "that would make the session
somewhat more effective. So if you care to come back, that would make it
more effective." She said, "All right, I'll come back." She did. The
dislike was still there. It hadn't gone away, but it wasn't getting in the
way. What you are aware of you are in control of; what you are not aware
of is in control of you. You are always a slave to what you're not aware
of. When you're aware of it, you're free from it. It's there, but you're
not affected by it. You're not controlled by it; you're not enslaved by
it. That's the difference.
Awareness, awareness, awareness, awareness. What they trained us to do in
that course was to become participant observers. To put it somewhat
graphically, I'd be talking to you and at the same time I'd be out there
watching you and watching me. When I'm listening to you, it's infinitely
more important for me to listen to me than to listen to you. Of course,
it's important to listen to you, but it's more important that I listen to
me. Otherwise I won't be hearing you. Or I'll be distorting everything
you say. I'll be coming at you from my own conditioning. I'll be reacting
to you in all kinds of ways from my insecurities, from my need to
manipulate you, from my desire to succeed, from irritations and feelings
that I might not be aware of. So it's frightfully important that I listen
to me when I'm listening to you. That's what they were training us to do,
obtaining awareness.
You don't always have to imagine yourself hovering somewhere in the
air. Just to get a rough idea of what I'm talking about, imagine a good
driver, driving a car, who's concentrating on what you're saying. In fact,
he may even be having an argument with you, but he's perfectly aware of the
road signals. The moment anything untoward happens, the moment there's any
sound, or noise, or bump, he'll hear it at once. He'll say, "Are you sure
you closed that door back there?" How did he do that? He was aware, he
was alert. The focus of his attention was on the conversation, or
argument, but his awareness was more diffused. He was taking in all kinds
of things.
What I'm advocating here is not concentration. That's not important. Many
meditative techniques inculcate concentration, but I'm leery of that. They
involve violence and frequently they involve further programming and
conditioning. What I would advocate is awareness, which is not the same as
concentration at all. Concentration is a spotlight. You can be distracted
from that, but when you're practicing awareness, you're never distracted.
Awareness is a floodlight. You're open to anything that comes within the
scope of your consciousness. When awareness is turned on, there's never
any distraction, because you're always aware of whatever happens to be.
Say I'm looking at those trees and I'm worrying. Am I distracted? I am
distracted only if I mean to concentrate on the trees. But if I'm aware
that I'm worried, too, that isn't a distraction at all. Just be aware of
where your attention goes. When anything goes awry or anything untoward
happens, you'll be alerted at once. Something's going wrong! The moment
any negative feeling comes into consciousness, you'll be alerted. You're
like the driver of the car.
I told you that St. Teresa of Avila said God gave her the grace of
disidentifying herself with herself. You hear children talk that way. A
two-year-old says, "Tommy had his breakfast this morning." He doesn't say
"I," although he is Tommy. He says "Tommy" -- in the third
person. Mystics feel that way. They have disidentified from themselves
and they are at peace.
This was the grace St. Teresa was talking about. This is the "I" that the
mystic masters of the East are constantly urging people to discover. And
those of the West, too! And you can count Meister Eckhart among
them. They are urging people to discover the "I."
|
|